Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
_gat
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests when using Google Tag Manager
1 minute
_gid
ID used to identify users for 24 hours after last activity
24 hours
_ga_
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gali
Used by Google Analytics to determine which links on a page are being clicked
30 seconds
_ga
ID used to identify users
2 years
__utmx
Used to determine whether a user is included in an A / B or Multivariate test.
18 months
__utmv
Contains custom information set by the web developer via the _setCustomVar method in Google Analytics. This cookie is updated every time new data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
2 years after last activity
__utmz
Contains information about the traffic source or campaign that directed user to the website. The cookie is set when the GA.js javascript is loaded and updated when data is sent to the Google Anaytics server
6 months after last activity
__utmc
Used only with old Urchin versions of Google Analytics and not with GA.js. Was used to distinguish between new sessions and visits at the end of a session.
End of session (browser)
__utmb
Used to distinguish new sessions and visits. This cookie is set when the GA.js javascript library is loaded and there is no existing __utmb cookie. The cookie is updated every time data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
30 minutes after last activity
__utmt
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests
10 minutes
__utma
ID used to identify users and sessions
2 years after last activity
_gac_
Contains information related to marketing campaigns of the user. These are shared with Google AdWords / Google Ads when the Google Ads and Google Analytics accounts are linked together.
90 days
Painting the Cygnus and battle damage looked to be more demanding than the preceding steps.
Can’t say that it was, really… You do have to be more precise, and know what you will do in advance, but it’s a lot quicker. For any freehand, a separate drawing can help.
BoW Romain
Great job Romain. Very courageous of you to take this on. I think its much easier to talk strategy or unbox a mini than it is to do anything like this.
I like really defined shadow lines for eyes, so I avoid any washes, as I think it dulls the contrast / edge line. Just a preference thing, but I like a thin pure black edge line to help make the eye pop with contrast.
I find that I prefer a glowing eye effect where the eye is almost white with just a hint of color (pretty much what you did here), and the reflected area around the eye has more color. This makes the glow appear to be extremely bright… just a taste / preference thing. Another, perhaps too subtle consideration is that as the source of the light is the eye, you should highlight the inside ridges. I see a lot of attempts at glowing eyes, etc, that are unsuccessful because the highlighting does not accurately consider the directionality of the wavelength / light source location. Also, the problem with blue glow on blue armor – hard to make it clearly look like glow as opposed to highlight. I think I would pull in just a bit of red or yellow, just enough to make it be slightly different in hue.
Good overview on how to shade yellow. That’s one I have always had trouble with.
Argh, the tip on that detail brush is driving me crazy….
You know, I don’t mind seeing the close up camera on screen, why don’t you request that they set up the detail camera behind your shoulder, so you are not painting in such an awkward position?
Hmm bad edit on the second bit of battle damage, you were working on it and then it was suddenly done, but you couldn’t see it…
The verdigris / oxidization, it seems a bit bright because its on the shady side of the model? When you look at the final model in rotation, it almost looks like there is some strange light source coming from behind and below that is lighting up the underside of the model. (This is my only real criticism, everything else is just comments.)
Just some personal preference stuff…
Would you, if you wanted to add more contrast, shade the bolts / rivets on the model with a wash or direct application? I find that rivets and bolts get lost on these models if the edge of the join is not shaded. It does take time to do it but I think its worth it…
Excessive realism: I think you need to determine, for an entire army scheme, the level of realism / battle wear you are going for so that it is consistent throughout your army. I also agree that a little goes a really long way. I’ve seen otherwise great looking armies diminished due to excessive attempts at realistic battle damage and wear. Of course this is a stylistic choice, but I find that dirty, heavily damaged armies just don’t appeal to me.
Why no specular highlighting? Just a level of detail choice?
I don’t know much about strategy, hence the whole painting thing… lol
The eyes are exactly the way i wanted them, and i did highlight around them properly… It’s not easy to see because the blue is close to the base color. This was supposed to be a glow, not headlights… So not too bright.
I find the verdigris quite realistic, as it’s quite clearer than the metal, even in shadows… This is a “daylight” miniature anyway. But shadows have color, they’re seldom black.
I presented a few ways to do battle damage in this tutorial just to teach you, and because the subject lended itself to it… I’m not usually a big fan. In another tutorial, I’ll teach you about more paint chipping, mud, dust, etc.
I think, likewise, specular highlighting deserves its own tutorial… There was no surface shiny enough to warrant it here (no NMM either) and it’s already quite a dense tutorial as it is !
You’re just greedy…
As for the level of battle damage in an army, I think one would do well to limit oneself to paint chipping on the rank and file, or nothing at all : spending too much time on small details no one will see is just silly. Go crazy on the characters, though, as they’re the eye catchers, and they’re going to be picked up if they’re nice enough !
Thank you for expecting a high standard, it keeps me on my toes… But these are tutorials to show people how to easily paint something you’ll be proud of, not necessarily how to win a 9.5 on CMON, or a Slayer Sword.
BoW Romain
Appreciate the reply in detail.
I guess you are going to have to get a sub category or new category for the painting tutorials called Master Class or some such, for the BoW fans that at some point want to take their painting to the next level. That’s a long ways off, but I think some of us would certainly appreciate it. That way you could clearly delineate between Table Top Ready painting techniques and Top Quality techniques. You will just have to clone yourself so you can do both!
No kidding, there isn’t enough hours in a day !
Still, there are already many a master-class on the Internet (even if the really great ones are more epxensive than our backstage pass…), whereas there’s not that many videos for beginners. I’ll do what’s needed first…
BoW Romain