Ill grab some of the bohemian sprues and mix them in with frostgrave pieces. Also the Vatican faction look interesting for silver bayonet!

Obligatory reference to Traveller : New Era … And then there’s the obvious one : Star Trek and Star Wars …

yeah BTech always appealed to me as a hard sci-fi timeline. It’s like playing historical periods in the future, and makes perfect sense within the universe they have created.

I would counter that with GW sells quite a considerable amount and has kept the game static. But your question does raise an interesting point that’s worth exploring

Happy Sunday

I don’t get what you mean about lack of progress in historicals? History is a constant state of progression which is why you don’t see Romans fighting Gustavus Adolphus. If you’re fighting a certain period it’s […]

If you look at Battle tech, they have advanced the time line and introduced new mechs and technology. They don’t obsolete mechs, you just pick a time line and then select the mechs from that time line. But if you […]

Happy Sunday! I struggle to get excited about moving timeline vs static timeline. Horses for courses, don’t really care… But what I did find myself thinking during the conversation was about the impact con […]

Counter question : why is (lack of) progress in historicals not an issue ? Or is it because there is a built-in progress regardless of era as there usually is a start, middle and end of a conflict? WW2 is […]

I like so much that they extol as virtues of their rules system, particularly the no clutter aspect. However, I get the distinct impression, given the above pictures, that the game involves figure removal. […]

Happy Sunday CoGs, OTTers and of course, the Backstagers!

Scibor Undead in the “dead guys wearing death imagery while being dead”… but looking amazing while doing it. I’m going to get some of those Scibor minis one of these days…