Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
_gat
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests when using Google Tag Manager
1 minute
_gid
ID used to identify users for 24 hours after last activity
24 hours
_ga_
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gali
Used by Google Analytics to determine which links on a page are being clicked
30 seconds
_ga
ID used to identify users
2 years
__utmx
Used to determine whether a user is included in an A / B or Multivariate test.
18 months
__utmv
Contains custom information set by the web developer via the _setCustomVar method in Google Analytics. This cookie is updated every time new data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
2 years after last activity
__utmz
Contains information about the traffic source or campaign that directed user to the website. The cookie is set when the GA.js javascript is loaded and updated when data is sent to the Google Anaytics server
6 months after last activity
__utmc
Used only with old Urchin versions of Google Analytics and not with GA.js. Was used to distinguish between new sessions and visits at the end of a session.
End of session (browser)
__utmb
Used to distinguish new sessions and visits. This cookie is set when the GA.js javascript library is loaded and there is no existing __utmb cookie. The cookie is updated every time data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
30 minutes after last activity
__utmt
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests
10 minutes
__utma
ID used to identify users and sessions
2 years after last activity
_gac_
Contains information related to marketing campaigns of the user. These are shared with Google AdWords / Google Ads when the Google Ads and Google Analytics accounts are linked together.
90 days
Also good for Half tracks men and SP guns and at anti tank 12 (yeah thats right anti tank 12) they will punch holes in Ishermans like well an anti tank 12 ranting… 12 and 5 shots… cries… if they stay alive long enough.
Great model with great use in any Arab army
Awesome looking vehicles. I know these were based on T-34 chassis and then the T-54, but notice how one set of road wheels is missing (four per side instead of the usual five)? I checked a few sources and sure enough, that is correct. I wonder why the engineers took these out?
Dr. Dave is right, though. Auto-fire 57mms will put a whole lot o’ hurtin’ on any soft targets in range, and probably relatively light Israeli armor like surplus M3s, M113s, AMX-13s, post-war Sherman upgrades.
At 2:40, are those optical rangefinders? I know the ZSU-57-2 wasn’t radar-controlled (not util the ZSU-23-4). Shooting down a low-flying jet “by eye” had to be tough.
It think its more of a case of lets scare the ever loving crud out of the pilot and he wont try to bomb us…. and tbh I get that I really do
True enough, @lafayette . 57mm shells coming at me at 300 rpm would be pretty scary, even if I was flying a Phantom or a Mirage.
Actually the ZSU-57 is pretty worthless against jets. The fire control is seriously outdated and the turret doesn’t turn fast enough to track fast targets…
Small wonder the soviets went for the Shilka and dumped these on their “allies”.
I actually made comments like this when Flames of War came out with their 88 “AA” half tracks recently (of course you’re completely correct) and the next thing I knew I was getting multiple “thumbs-down.” Oh well. 🙂 I play Avalon Hill’s “Arab-Israeli Wars” (covers 56, 67, 73, and even 82 wars) and they don’t even include this vehicle, which admittedly is kind of a shame since I would love to use it against ground targets. They do include the Shilka, though! 🙂 Egyptians and Syrians didn’t get them until the 1973 Yom Kippur War, where they do great work against Skyhawks, Mirage IIIs, and Phantom IIs along with SA-2 SAMs. It’ll be interesting to see if Battlefront ever expands their Fate of a Nation line to the Yom Kippur War.
What, you’re only supposed to like things and get booed down if everything isn’t awesome?
I actually like the model. It looks scary even if it is something of a paper tiger.
They have turret from one of these at the Maritime museum in Tallinn. Their view of its worth is pretty scathing… Which is an interesting contrast to the full example at the air defence museum near Helsinki, where they list the technical details but refrain from commenting on its actual worth (admittedly, this applies to most of the exhibits there).
Yeah, @maxxon , I guess I made a few comments on the dubious effectiveness of 88s on half tracks trying to hit low-flying, high-speed fighter bombers, the kinds of planes you’d expect to face in a FoW game. My post may not have been terribly well written, however, and some folks might have taken that I was “attacking” the FoW game. We got it sorted, no worries.
Helsinki and Tallinin? Those are some interesting places. There must be some great museums up there. We recently did some PanzerLeader situations based on Finnish operations toward Vyborg/Vipuri during the “Continuation War” of 41-44. Do you live around the Baltic / Estonia / St Petersburg / Finland, or just travel there?
We live in a pretty boring place history wise (Fort Lauderdale, Florida), but my girlfriend and I are heading to Normandy later this summer for a “battlefield walk” through all the beachheads, etc., for the 70th anniversary of the Overlord landings. Definitely looking forward to some of the museums there.
Meanwhile, I suppose the ZSU-57-2 was just unlucky enough to be “between generations.” Such a vehicle might have been effective in WW2 with fast-firing, proximity-fused ammunition against relatively slow propeller attack planes with nothing longer-ranged than a 5-inch rocket. But it didn’t come out until the jet age. Meanwhile, it came out BEFORE radar-controlled AA guns like the ZSU-23-4 or the newest Russian AA gunnery vehicle, (to my knowledge), the ZSU-30-6 “Tunguska.”
So yeah, the poor “Zoo-57” was a pretty poor AA vehicle, at least against jets. Helicopters, on the other hand, would be “meat on the table” for this thing, not that IDF used that many in 67 or even 73. And of course, as we keep saying, against soft ground targets, those 57s must have had a pretty long reach.
Maybe the PAVN version in Vietnam (probably not though) but I’m not going to start AIW. After what BF has done here in Australia my next game/period won’t be a BF one.