limburger
isn’t that the same turd in a box that said that everyone who paints Germans for WW 2 is a Nazi ?
Anyways …
– ‘AI ethics’ lady didn’t tell him ‘no’ at any point ?
That means she is either not doing ethics or he never really asked her the meaningful questions related to the project.
– copyright is no joke and I’m surprised that didn’t trigger this
I seriously doubt GW would be ok with anyone using their products as a source for anything ‘AI’ related.
Just because the big boys can do this that doesn’t mean us mere mortals are allowed to do so.
– you can run ‘AI’ locally. Ollama can do that. It may not be as fast or as efficient, but at least the environmental impact is reduced to a really big and powerful pc.
– first rule of ‘AI’ tools : always check and verify the answers because it will hallucinate without telling you
(I’ve run into that one multiple times. )
– if you’ve spent a few moments doing research on ‘AI’ then you’d know of the rather questionable ethics of the company behind Chat-gpt. And no … that wasn’t ‘recent’ events. The simple fact that they went from ‘open source’ to ‘for profit’ should have been a warning. This was known a year ago already (November 2024 to be precise).
– No amount of disclaimers will stop people from trusting the results the program gives
