Nice Minis, perfect for setting up as a raiding party vs the Scots (or the welsh), Victrix have you covered for the Scots (along with the amazing Forgu models now available from Fenris […]

….and just as you get used to 10th Edition (and GW make some changes to the rules to fix their horrid rules that never seem to be proofread or even playtested these days). GW RELEASE AN ALL NEW RULE SYSTEM […]

Just seen the German one, again Infantry and ATGs (and no tanks). BUT 4 88mm (the German DID use other ATGs you know) AND every infantry stand is a MG42 stand. A bit ridiculous if you ask me (for Germans holding […]

wait a minute. You don’t like asembling. You don’t like painting. You don’t like warhammer 40k. I dunno man, feels like you’re in the wrong place…

Most wargames don’t really provide a simulation of a battle. Doesn’t mean I don’t want the table to look like more than randomly placed, line of site blocking obstacles. That’s what modern warhammer has really devolved into

More gorgeous infinity miniatures, as usual. Not sure I am keen on the scenery this time, those stalacmites look a nit naff

This can’t be right…… A Battlefront release with NO Tanks (and no 88mm). I may have to pick up a box for playing in an Italian campaign (Note the Free French Algerian troops also fought not only in the […]

@jcdent you sound like you’re a lot of fun at parties!

Pre-painted GW terrain is a great idea, however, it still leaves the worst part of GW terrain to the player: assembly.

Considering how big tournament playing is, I think you’re overselling people’s ability to identify bad rules.

Painting is the least fun part of the hobby for me, so I am in full support of pre-painted terrain, pre-painted minis, commission painting, buying painted armies, etc. The only thing worse than painting is GW […]

>not a battlefield It’s OK, GW rules don’t simulate battles in any way